Open Access Article
Journal of Engineering Research. 2026; 5: (3) ; 89-96 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jer.20260040.
Construction and practice of an evaluation system for intelligent safety design in an IoT environment
物联网环境下智能安全设计的评估体系构建与实践
作者:
赵康1 *,
张亮1,
屈煦通1,
刘亚平1,
鲁斌2,
米超2,
任卫华2
1陕西新能选煤技术有限公司 陕西西安
2山西汇永青峰选煤工程技术有限公司 山西朔州
*通讯作者:
赵康,单位:陕西新能选煤技术有限公司 陕西西安 ;
发布时间: 2026-07-19 总浏览量: 6
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
为评价物联网环境下智能安全系统,构建由目标层、准则层和指标层组成的“三层六维双判据”体系,从安全性、可靠性、智能性、环境适应性、运行效率、经济与绿色性6个维度设置指标,采用“安全门槛+绩效改进”方法,并以选煤厂智能安全供配电系统验证。结果表明:身份识别精度100%,系统无故障运行时间≥99.9%,数据查询响应≤1.5 s,非计划停电识别准确率92.5%、平均响应≤4.2 min;应用后停送电耗时缩短40%以上,故障停机减少50%,维护效率提高30%,吨煤电耗由2.96 kW•h/t降至2.51 kW•h/t。该体系可同时表征安全底线与运行绩效,为燃气、供热等能源物联网系统安全评价提供参考。
关键词: 物联网;智能安全;评估体系;安全联锁;风险评价;能源系统
Abstract
To scientifically evaluate the design and operation level of intelligent safety systems in an industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environment, a three-layer, six-dimension and dual-criterion evaluation system is established to overcome the limitations of single accuracy indices or subjective composite scores. The system consists of target, criterion and indicator layers, covering safety, reliability, intelligence, environmental adaptability, operational efficiency, and economic/green performance. A dual method combining mandatory safety thresholds with performance-improvement evaluation is adopted and verified using an intelligent safe power-distribution system in a coal preparation plant. The identity-recognition accuracy was 100%, system uptime was at least 99.9%, data-query response time was within 1.5 s, and unplanned-outage identification accuracy reached 92.5% with an average response time within 4.2 min. After application, power-switching operation time decreased by more than 40%, equipment-failure downtime decreased by 50%, maintenance efficiency increased by 30%, and specific electricity consumption decreased from 2.96 to 2.51 kW•h/t. The proposed system integrates safety bottom-line requirements with intelligent operating performance and can provide a reference for safety evaluation of gas, heating and other energy IIoT systems.
Key words: Internet of Things; Intelligent safety; Evaluation system; Safety interlock; Risk assessment; Energy system
参考文献 References
[1] 苗庆伟, 高文学, 杨林, 等. 绿色供热系统评价指标体系[J]. 煤气与热力, 2025, 45(8): 86-88.
[2] KIZIROGLOU M E, et al. A robust end-to-end IoT system for supporting workers in mining industries[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(11): 3317.
[3] SUN Z, CHEN G, DING Y, et al. Joint safety and security risk analysis in industrial cyber-physical systems: a survey[J]. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 2024, 9(4): 334-349.
[4] 宋蒲阳, 曹炳峰, 杨颖. LNG厂站液氮气化系统与制氮系统互联互备工艺[J/OL]. 煤气与热力, 2026.
[5] GB 26860—2011 电力安全工作规程 发电厂和变电站电气部分[S].
[6] AQ 1010—2005 选煤厂安全规程[S].
[7] IEC 61508:2010 Functional safety of electrical/ electronic/ programmable electronic safety-related systems[S].
[8] GB/T 7251.8—2020 低压成套开关设备和控制设备 第8部分:智能型成套设备通用技术要求[S].
[9] 王宇涵. 基于工业现场总线的选煤厂智能低压供配电系统设计应用[J]. 选煤技术, 2024, 52(6): 74-78.
[10] 李涛, 逯新保, 郎舒婷. 智能供配电系统在选煤厂的应用[J]. 选煤技术, 2021, 49(5): 92-95.
[11] 国家能源局. 煤矿智能化建设指南(2021年版)[S/OL]. 2021.
[12] IEC 62443-3-3:2013 Industrial communication networks—Network and system security—System security requirements and security levels[S].
引用本文
赵康, 张亮, 屈煦通, 刘亚平, 鲁斌, 米超, 任卫华, 物联网环境下智能安全设计的评估体系构建与实践[J]. 工程学研究, 2026; 5: (3) : 89-96.